They say: “That, then, would be a losing return!”)
They say, ‘That will clearly be a losing restoration!’
They said: "This is an impossible recurrence. "
And they say, "In that case, then, it would be an investment of loss!"
They say: “That, then, would be a losing return!”)
They said: "This is an impossible recurrence."
They said, "This is an impossible recurrence."
They had said, "This is an impossible recurrence."
They say: "Then this returning will be a dead loss. "
They say, "That, then, would be a losing return. "
they add, "That, then, would be a return with loss!"
They say: Then that would be a vain proceeding.
They say: "That will then be a return with a great loss!"
"Should this be true", they say, "it will mean immeasurable loss and condign punishment".
These are those who used to mock at the idea of Resurrection.
They say: "It would in that case, be a return with loss!"
They say: "It would, in that case, be a return with loss!"
Adding, "Then such a return would be a ˹total˺ loss ˹for us˺!"
They say, "If so, that will be a harmful homecoming."
‘Such a return is impossible!’
They shall say, 'That then were a losing return!'
they say, 'That then were a losing return!'
They said, "That then would be a return, causing loss. "
They will say, "Lo, that then would be a losing recurrence!"
They say, this then will be a return to loss.
They say: "In that case, it will be a return with loss!"
(And) who say, `Then such a resurrection shall indeed be fraught with loss. '
They will say, ‘This, then, is a ruinous return!'